OSK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

PACCAR has a net margin of 6.58% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of 11.03%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.78% beat PACCAR's return on equity of 24.02%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $116.01, signalling upside risk potential of 2.43%. On the other hand PACCAR has an analysts' consensus of $115.24 which suggests that it could grow by 2.42%. Given that Oshkosh has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Oshkosh is more attractive than PACCAR.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.215, which suggesting that the stock is 21.495% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PACCAR has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.304%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. PACCAR offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.93% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR pays out 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than PACCAR quarterly revenues of $7.9B. Oshkosh's net income of $180.3M is lower than PACCAR's net income of $872M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.00x while PACCAR's PE ratio is 14.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.70x versus 1.76x for PACCAR. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gibraltar Industries has a net margin of 6.58% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of 9.42%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.78% beat Gibraltar Industries's return on equity of 11.71%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $116.01, signalling upside risk potential of 2.43%. On the other hand Gibraltar Industries has an analysts' consensus of $87.00 which suggests that it could grow by 39.38%. Given that Gibraltar Industries has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe Gibraltar Industries is more attractive than Oshkosh.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.215, which suggesting that the stock is 21.495% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gibraltar Industries has a beta of 1.188, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.818%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. Gibraltar Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Gibraltar Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Gibraltar Industries quarterly revenues of $361.2M. Oshkosh's net income of $180.3M is higher than Gibraltar Industries's net income of $34M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.00x while Gibraltar Industries's PE ratio is 17.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.70x versus 1.44x for Gibraltar Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Shyft Group has a net margin of 6.58% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of 1.61%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.78% beat The Shyft Group's return on equity of -1.51%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $116.01, signalling upside risk potential of 2.43%. On the other hand The Shyft Group has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 24.79%. Given that The Shyft Group has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe The Shyft Group is more attractive than Oshkosh.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.215, which suggesting that the stock is 21.495% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Shyft Group has a beta of 1.660, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.048%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. The Shyft Group offers a yield of 1.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.93% of its earnings as a dividend. The Shyft Group pays out 109.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Shyft Group's is not.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than The Shyft Group quarterly revenues of $194.1M. Oshkosh's net income of $180.3M is higher than The Shyft Group's net income of $3.1M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.00x while The Shyft Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.70x versus 0.53x for The Shyft Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xos has a net margin of 6.58% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of -66.57%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.78% beat Xos's return on equity of -80.19%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $116.01, signalling upside risk potential of 2.43%. On the other hand Xos has an analysts' consensus of $9.75 which suggests that it could grow by 223.92%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than Oshkosh.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.215, which suggesting that the stock is 21.495% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xos has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. Xos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Xos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Xos quarterly revenues of $15.8M. Oshkosh's net income of $180.3M is higher than Xos's net income of -$10.5M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.00x while Xos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.70x versus 0.33x for Xos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.